RESUMO
Introducción: Los análisis bibliométricos permiten evaluar cuantitativamente las características de una publicación científica. Objetivo: Realizar un análisis bibliométrico de los artículos originales de la revista EnfermeríaIntensiva de 2001 a 2020. Resultados: La revista EnfermeríaIntensiva ha publicado, entre 2001 y 2020, 438 trabajos, de los cuales 259 son artículos originales (59,1%). Estos artículos originales son en su mayoría estudios cuantitativos (76,1%), con una media de 30,5 (DE 13,9) referencias bibliográficas, 4,9 (DE 1,7) citas en los repertorios Web of Science y Scopus, y 15.489,5 visitas/descargas (mediana 9.090 y rango intercuartílico 4.567-15.260) según información de la web de la revista. Estos originales han sido firmados por 1.345 autores, lo que supone un índice de colaboración de 5,2 (DE 0,7). Un 78,0% de los autores son esporádicos, al haber publicado un solo trabajo. La mayoría de los artículos pertenecen a autores procedentes de hospitales y centros universitarios, situados geográficamente en las comunidades de Madrid, Cataluña, Navarra y Andalucía. Conclusiones: Existe una escasa colaboración internacional, autonómica e institucional, produciéndose el mayor nivel de colaboración entre autores de un mismo centro. La revista se ha consolidado en el panorama de la investigación científica de enfermería en España y muestra unos indicadores bibliométricos similares o incluso superiores a otras publicaciones de su entorno.(AU)
Introduction: Bibliometric analysis allow the quantitative evaluation of the characteristics of a scientific publication. Objective: To perform a bibliometric analysis of original articles in the journal EnfermeríaIntensiva from 2001 to 2020. Results: The journal EnfermeríaIntensiva has published, between 2001 and 2020, 438 works, of which 259 are original articles (59.1%). These original articles are mostly quantitative studies (76.1%), with an average of 30.5 bibliographic references (SD 13.9), 4.9 citations (SD 1.7) in the Web of Science and Scopus repertoires, and 15,489.5 visits/downloads (median 9,090 and interquartile range 4,567-15,260) according to information on the magazine's website. These originals have been signed by 1,345 authors, which represents a collaboration index of 5.2 (SD 0.7). A percentage of 78.0 of the authors are sporadic, having published only one work. Most of the articles come from authors who work in institutionally located in hospitals and university centers, and geographically in the communities of Madrid, Cataluña, Navarra and Andalucía. Conclusions: There is little international, regional and institutional collaboration, producing the highest level of collaboration between authors from the same center. The journal has established itself in the panorama of scientific nursing research in Spain and shows bibliometric indicators similar or even superior to other publications in its environment.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Bibliometria , Publicações Científicas e Técnicas , Unidades de Terapia IntensivaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bibliometric analysis allow the quantitative evaluation of the characteristics of a scientific publication. OBJECTIVE: To perform a bibliometric analysis of original articles in the journal Enfermería Intensiva from 2001 to 2020. RESULTS: The journal Enfermería Intensiva has published, between 2001 and 2020, 438 works, of which 259 are original articles (59.1%). These original articles are mostly quantitative studies (76.1%), with an average of 30.5 bibliographic references (SD 13.9), 4.9 citations (SD 1.7) in the Web of Science and Scopus repertoires, and 15,489.5 visits/downloads (median 9090 and interquartile range 4567-15,260) according to information on the magazine's website. These originals have been signed by 1345 authors, which represents a collaboration index of 5.2. 78.0% of the authors are sporadic, having published only one work. Most of the articles come from authors who work in institutionally located in hospitals and university centers, and geographically in the Communities of Madrid, Cataluña, Navarra and Andalucía. CONCLUSIONS: There is little international, regional and institutional collaboration, producing the highest level of collaboration between authors from the same center. The journal has established itself in the panorama of scientific nursing research in Spain and shows bibliometric indicators similar or even superior to other publications in its environment.
Assuntos
Pesquisa em Enfermagem , Publicações , Humanos , Bibliometria , Espanha , Instalações de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The continuous increase in scientific knowledge in the health field, the development of new technologies and the rising cost of publications means that libraries are essential for patient care, medical education and research. In Spain some deficiencies have been seen in hospital libraries, and their cost is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost of public hospital libraries in Spain and to estimate the cost of adapting them to international standards. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of public hospitals larger than 100 beds, or smaller public hospitals with teaching accreditation. Information on the variables of interest was collected by questionnaire mailed to the libraries and followed up by telephone. Data collection was completed in 1996. The information on costs is for 1994. A sensitivity analysis was done to examine the effects of imprecise estimates and assumptions. RESULTS: Of the 314 hospitals identified, 211 (67.2%) had libraries. The 1994 cost of the of the 211 libraries was 3,060 million pesetas (mean cost: 14.5 million pesetas). Personnel costs were the most important item (38% of the total), followed by the cost of subscriptions (29%). The cost of hospital libraries represented 0.08% of national public expenditures on health. The cost of correcting inadequacies in accordance with international standards would increase spending by about 400 million pesetas the first year (0.01% of public spending on health). CONCLUSIONS: The cost of hospital libraries represents only a small fraction of public spending on health. Correction of the observed deficiencies and the importance of libraries in the health system would require increasing spending to about 0.1% of public spending on health.
